Intellectual AI Boot Camp · Part 2 · 25 Aug 2026

Sections· Evaluation

Program evaluation · 9/9 responses

The room has spoken.

A strong result, and a clear direction for what comes next.

Headline metrics

Overall experience

5.56 / 6

Median 6 · n = 9 · scale 1–6

Distribution: 5 = 4; 6 = 5

Able to apply the learning

5.22 / 6

Median 5 · n = 9 · scale 1–6

Distribution: 4 = 2; 5 = 3; 6 = 4

Oskar and Joakim as facilitators

4.89 / 5

Median 5 · n = 9 · scale 1–5

Distribution: 4 = 1; 5 = 8

Likelihood to recommend

9.44 / 10

Median 10 · n = 9 · scale 1–10

Distribution: 8 = 2; 9 = 1; 10 = 6

Derived metric

Derived NPS: +78

7 promoters · 2 passives · 0 detractors. Derived from the standard 0–10 recommendation distribution.

What landed

  • Hands-on, interactive work tied to real business challenges.
  • A practical process for creating agents and testing them against expectations and boundaries.
  • Permission to experiment, learn by doing and avoid waiting for perfection.
  • Confidence to continue independently, with teams and with the management group.

What comes next

  • Scale the experience beyond this room and into teams.
  • Create a sustainable way to follow fast-moving AI functionality.
  • Go deeper into the technology, including MCPs and the infrastructure behind agents.

Voices from the room

“Hands on sessions that we can reuse returning to the office really helps. This session 2 was really valuable.”

“I will be able to take the next steps on my own, with my team and the mgt group.”

“I now need to find a way to scale this experience for my team.”

Verbatim and anonymized, from the written responses.

Source